Federal Judge Strikes Down FTC’s Proposed Ban on Non-Competes

In a significant legal development, a federal judge recently struck down the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) proposed rule to ban non-compete agreements that was set to take effect September 4, 2024. The proposed rule would have required employers to send notices to their workers informing them their non-competes are unenforceable. 

Non-compete agreements have long been a controversial topic. Employers argue they protect proprietary information and investments in employee training, while employees and advocates often contend they unfairly restrict workers’ mobility and ability to seek better opportunities. The FTC’s proposed ban aimed to address these concerns by categorically eliminating most non-compete agreements across all sectors, however, the fate of such restrictions remains in limbo. For now, employers may continue using and enforcing non-compete agreements in line with state law. 

The FTC's Proposed Ban: A Bold Move for Worker Freedom

In January 2023, the FTC proposed a rule that would prohibit employers from entering into non-compete agreements with workers and would require employers to rescind existing non-competes. This would prevent employers from restricting workers' ability to work for or start a competing business after leaving their job. The rationale behind the proposal was to enhance worker mobility, increase wages, and increase innovation.

The proposed rule was broad in scope, applying to nearly all employees and independent contractors, encompassing even executives and high-level employees. It included a limited number of exceptions, such as non-competes linked to the sale of a business, but overall, the ban was aimed at dramatically reducing the use of non-competes.

The Legal Challenge and Federal Judge's Decision

Not long after the FTC announced its proposal, several business groups and companies filed lawsuits, challenging the agency’s authority to implement such a sweeping change. They argued that the FTC overstepped its statutory authority by seeking to regulate an issue traditionally governed by state law. Historically, non-compete agreements have been addressed at the state level, with different jurisdictions imposing varying degrees of restriction or outright bans. Some states, like California, have long prohibited non-competes, while others have allowed them under certain conditions.

In a recent ruling, a federal judge struck down the FTC’s proposed ban, finding that the agency lacked the necessary authority to issue a rule of this magnitude. Further, the court found that the proposed ban encroached on the states’ power to regulate employment contracts and exceeded the agency’s role in protecting competition under the Federal Trade Commission Act.

What Does This Mean for Employers and Employees?

For now, the ruling means that non-compete agreements remain enforceable under applicable state laws. Employers are free to continue using them where state law permits, but they should be mindful of ongoing litigation and regulatory developments. In California, for example, the general rule is any employment type contract that restrains someone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business is void.

While this ruling is a victory for businesses relying on non-competes to protect their trade secrets and client relationships, it is unlikely to be the end of the road for the debate surrounding non-compete agreements. The FTC has expressed interest in appealing the ruling and did note that the court’s decision does not prevent the FTC from addressing non-competes in case-by-case enforcement actions.

Best Practices for Employers Moving Forward

In light of the recent legal uncertainty, employers should carefully review their existing non-compete agreements to ensure compliance with state laws and avoid overly broad or restrictive language that could make agreements unenforceable. Here are a few key steps to take:

• Conduct a Legal Review: Employers should work with legal counsel to review the enforceability of non-compete clauses in the states where they operate.
• Consider Alternatives: Where non-competes may be legally challenged or impractical, consider using alternative protective measures, such as confidentiality agreements or non-solicitation clauses, which tend to be more widely enforceable.
• Monitor Developments: As this area of law continues to evolve, employers must stay up to date on changes at both the federal and state levels. The legal landscape surrounding non-competes is far from settled, and future regulations or court decisions could impact the enforceability of these agreements.

Conclusion

The federal judge’s ruling striking down the FTC’s proposed ban on non-compete agreements is a significant development in the ongoing debate about the role of non-competes in today’s economy. While this decision preserves the status quo for now, the issue is far from settled. Employers should remain vigilant and be prepared for potential changes as the legal landscape continues to shift.

Our firm regularly assists clients with employment contracts, including non-compete agreements, and we are well-equipped to help employers navigate the evolving legal framework. We recommend any employers concerned about their existing non-compete agreements or those looking to implement new ones reach out to us to discuss their options. Our team is available to review, revise, and draft agreements that protect your business interests while ensuring compliance with state laws. Don’t hesitate to contact us for tailored advice and support.

‍